Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
OK
The Blue Parakeet: Rethinking How You Read the Bible Hardcover – October 23, 2008
There is a newer edition of this item:
Purchase options and add-ons
Why Can’t I Just Be a Christian?” Parakeets make delightful pets. We cage them or clip their wings to keep them where we want them. Scot McKnight contends that many, conservatives and liberals alike, attempt the same thing with the Bible. We all try to tame it. McKnight’s The Blue Parakeet has emerged at the perfect time to cool the flames of a world on fire with contention and controversy. It calls Christians to a way to read the Bible that leads beyond old debates and denominational battles. It calls Christians to stop taming the Bible and to let it speak anew for a new generation. In his books The Jesus Creed and Embracing Grace, Scot McKnight established himself as one of America’s finest Christian thinkers, an author to be reckoned with. In The Blue Parakeet, McKnight again touches the hearts and minds of today’s Christians, this time challenging them to rethink how to read the Bible, not just to puzzle it together into some systematic theology but to see it as a Story that we’re summoned to enter and to carry forward in our day. In his own inimitable style, McKnight sets traditional and liberal Christianity on its ear, leaving readers equipped, encouraged, and emboldened to be the people of faith they long to be.
- Print length240 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherZondervan
- Publication dateOctober 23, 2008
- Dimensions5.75 x 0.88 x 8.25 inches
- ISBN-100310284880
- ISBN-13978-0310284888
Frequently bought together
Similar items that may deliver to you quickly
From the Publisher
The King Jesus Gospel | A Fellowship of Differents | The Blue Parakeet, 2nd ed. | |
---|---|---|---|
Customer Reviews |
4.6 out of 5 stars
676
|
4.4 out of 5 stars
218
|
4.6 out of 5 stars
534
|
Price | $12.15$12.15 | $15.78$15.78 | $13.96$13.96 |
More from Scot McKnight | The Original Good News Revisited | Showing the World God's Design for Life Together | Rethinking How You Read the Bible |
Editorial Reviews
From Publishers Weekly
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
Review
From the Back Cover
Parakeets make delightful pets. We cage them or clip their wings to keep them where we want them. Scot McKnight contends that many, conservatives and liberals alike, attempt the same thing with the Bible. We all try to tame it.
McKnight's The Blue Parakeet has emerged at the perfect time to cool the flames of a world on fire with contention and controversy. It calls Christians to a way to read the Bible that leads beyond old debates and denominational battles. It calls Christians to stop taming the Bible and to let it speak anew for a new generation.
In his books The Jesus Creed and Embracing Grace, Scot McKnight established himself as one of America's finest Christian thinkers, an author to be reckoned with.
In The Blue Parakeet, McKnight again touches the hearts and minds of today's Christians, this time challenging them to rethink how to read the Bible, not just to puzzle it together into some systematic theology but to see it as a Story that we're summoned to enter and to carry forward in our day.
In his own inimitable style, McKnight sets traditional and liberal Christianity on its ear, leaving readers equipped, encouraged, and emboldened to be the people of faith they long to be.
About the Author
Scot McKnight (PhD, Nottingham) is the Julius R. Mantey Professor of New Testament at Northern Seminary in Lombard, Illinois. He is the author of more than fifty books, including the award-winning The Jesus Creed as well as The King Jesus Gospel, A Fellowship of Differents, One.Life, The Blue Parakeet, and Kingdom Conspiracy.
Excerpt. © Reprinted by permission. All rights reserved.
The Blue Parakeet
Rethinking How You Read the BibleBy Scot McKnightZondervan
Copyright © 2008 Scot McKnightAll right reserved.
ISBN: 978-0-310-28488-8
Contents
1. The Book and I.......................................................92. The Birds and I......................................................22Part 1 Story: What Is the Bible?3. Inkblots and Puzzles.................................................414. It's a Story with Power!.............................................555. The Plot of the Wiki-Stories.........................................66Part 2 Listening: What Do I Do with the Bible?6. From Paper to Person.................................................837. God Speaks, We Listen................................................948. The Boring Chapter (on Missional Listening)..........................104Part 3 Discerning: How Do I Benefit from the Bible?9. The Year of Living Jesus-ly..........................................11510. Finding the Pattern of Discernment..................................129Part 4 Women in Church Ministries Today11. The Bible and Women.................................................15312. What Did Women Do in the Old Testament?.............................16313. What Did Women Do in the New Testament?.............................17614. Silencing the Blue Parakeet (1).....................................18615. Silencing the Blue Parakeet (2).....................................197Now What?...............................................................208After Words.............................................................213AppendicesAppendix 1. A Discernment Quiz..........................................215Appendix 2. Images of Jesus.............................................220Appendix 3. 1 Corinthians 14:34-35......................................224Appendix 4. Petronius on the New Roman Woman............................226Appendix 5. Juvenal on First-Century Women..............................228Notes...................................................................230Chapter One
The Book and IHow, Then, Are We to Live the Bible Today?
When I was in high school, I went to a Christian camp in Muscatine, Iowa, with Kris, my beautiful girlfriend (now my wife), to horse around for a week. But one morning, we were asked by our cabin leader to go spend a little time in prayer before breakfast. So I wandered out of our cabin, down a hill, alongside a basketball court, and through an open field, and then I walked over to the campfire area, climbed a short incline, and finally sat next to a tree, and prayed what my cabin leader told us to pray: "Lord, fill me with your Holy Spirit." I wasn't particularly open to spiritual things, but for some reason I said that prayer as our counselor advised. The Lord to whom I prayed that prayer caught me off guard. To quote the words of John Wesley, "My heart was strangely warmed." I don't remember what I expected to happen (probably nothing), but what happened was surprising. That prayer, or I should say the answer to that prayer, changed my life. I didn't speak in tongues, I didn't "see Jesus," and I didn't "hear God." My eyes didn't twitter, and I didn't become catatonic. When I prayed, something powerful happened, and I went to breakfast a new person. Within hours I knew what I wanted to do for my life.
On that hot summer day, I unexpectedly became a Bible student with a voracious appetite to read. Prior to that prayer I had very little interest in the Bible, and when it came to routine reading, I read only what my teachers assigned and Sports Illustrated. Within a week or two I began to read the Bible through from Genesis to Revelation, four chapters a day. I finished my reading the next spring, getting ahead of schedule because there were too many days when four chapters were not enough. My habit at the time was to arise early to read at least two chapters before going off to school, and then to read two chapters or so at night before I went to bed. I read the Scofield King James Bible, and Paul's letter to the Galatians became my favorite book. The Bible was full of surprises for me, and my eyes, mind, and heart were stuck on wide-open wonder. All because I asked God's Spirit to fill me.
Some of my former Sunday school teachers were as surprised as I was by what was happening. My youth pastor encouraged me to read serious books, and he also modeled a way to study the Bible by teaching Romans to our youth group. He also suggested I learn Greek, which, because he had a spare beginning Greek grammar book, I began. I had no idea what I was doing, but I liked languages, so I plugged away, never knowing quite what to expect. My father gave me some books to read, like John Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress. I devoured books. My teachers observed that I read books for class, not because I had to, but to learn and to engage in conversation.
I had no idea what I was getting into when I asked God's Spirit to fill me. I had no idea that I would go to college in Grand Rapids and become a bookaholic, buying books with money I didn't have! I hung out at Eerdmans and Zondervan and Baker and Kregel looking for bargains. I knew the sales clerks by name and they knew mine. I had no idea that I would then go on to seminary and from there for doctoral studies in England (Nottingham). I had no idea how hard it might be to find a teaching position. But I have lived a privileged life, teaching at a seminary for a dozen years and now teaching undergraduates at North Park University for nearly fifteen years. I had no idea that I would eventually get to travel to and speak in churches around the world, that I would get to write books about Jesus and Paul and Peter and the Bible, and that I would become friends with Bible scholars all around the world. I just had no idea that teaching the Bible meant these things when I asked God's Spirit to fill me. All I know is that from the time I was converted, I wanted to study the Bible. I'm sitting right now in my study, surrounded by books, books about the Bible, and I love what I do. I just had no idea.
The Discovery of a Question
Throughout this process of conversion and reading the Bible, I made discoveries that created a question that disturbed me and still does. Many of my fine Christian friends, pastors, and teachers routinely made the claim that they were Bible-believing Christians, and they were committed to the whole Bible and that-and this was one of the favorite lines-"God said it, I believe it, that settles it for me!" They were saying two things and I add my response (which expresses my disturbance):
One: We believe everything the Bible says, therefore ...
Two: We practice whatever the Bible says.
Three: Hogwash!
Why say "hogwash," a tasty, salty word I learned from my father? Because I was reading the same Bible they were reading, and I observed that, in fact-emphasize that word "fact"-whatever they were claiming was not in "fact" what they were doing. (Nor was I.) What I discovered is that we all pick and choose. I must confess this discovery did not discourage me as much as it disturbed me, and then it made me intensely curious (and it is why I wrote this book). The discoveries and disturbances converged onto one big question:
How, then, are we to live out the Bible today?
This question never has been and never will be adequately answered with: The Bible says it, and that settles it for me. Why? Because no one does everything the Bible says. Perhaps you expected this question: How, then, are we to apply the Bible today? That's a good question, but I think the word "apply" is a bit clinical and not as dynamic as the phrase "live out." But we will get to that later.
Here's an example of my discovery process as a young student of the Bible. When you and I read the letter of James, brother of Jesus, we hear these words:
Those who consider themselves religious and yet do not keep a tight rein on their tongues deceive themselves, and their religion is worthless. Religion that God our Father accepts as pure and faultless is this: to look after orphans and widows in their distress and to keep oneself from being polluted by the world. (James 1:26-27)
James knew what he was talking about, and, truth be told, there's nothing hard about understanding what James said. It's about as plain as the directions on a stop sign. The clarity of these words is the problem. For all kinds of reasons, and we'll get to those soon, what James said had almost nothing to do with the Christian groups I knew:
We didn't like the word "religious."
We didn't measure Christian maturity by control of the tongue (according to what I was hearing).
Pure and faultless-and that's pretty high quality, you must admit-religion, according to James, isn't measured by church attendance, Bible reading, witnessing, going to seminary, or anything else I found in our discipleship and church membership manuals.
Nope, for James, a pure Christian, the kind God approves of, was one who showed compassion to orphans and widows and avoided being polluted by sin at all costs. Frankly, we emphasized the not being polluted by sin, but we defined "polluted" in ways that had nothing to do with compassion for the marginalized and suffering. For instance, we were dead set against movies, drinking wine, and sex before marriage. In our version of reality, these three were all related-if you drank with your girlfriend, you'd lose your senses and go to a movie and end up having sex. I'm not only making fun of my past, I'm emphasizing how distorted things got-a good, solid Christian was one who didn't do specific things that were against the rules. It also had to do with what we did-which was go to church weekly, read the Bible daily, and witness as often as we could. These aren't bad things; in fact, I learned to love the Bible because of this context. But the one thing we didn't do was follow everything James said!
As I kept looking around me, this began to disturb me. How in the world were we reading the same Bible? One thing was clear, we were all reading the Bible the same way, and that meant we had somehow learned not to follow the plain words of James.
What I learned was an uncomfortable but incredibly intriguing truth: Every one of us adopts the Bible and (at the same time) adapts the Bible to our culture. In less-appreciated terms, I'll put it this way: Everyone picks and chooses. I know this sounds out of the box and off the wall for many, but no matter how hard we try to convince ourselves otherwise, it's true. We pick and choose. (It's easier for us to hear "we adopt and adapt," but the two expressions amount to the same thing.)
I believe many of us want to know why we pick and choose. Even more importantly, many of us want to know how to do this in a way that honors God and embraces the Bible as God's Word for all times. We'll get to that. First, I offer some examples of picking and choosing, or "adopting and adapting."
Picking and Choosing
Sabbath
The Bible I read both instituted and did not appear to back down from the Sabbath. Observing the Sabbath meant not working from Friday night to Saturday night (Exodus 20:9-10), and I found numerous references in the Acts of the Apostles to the Christian observance of Sabbath. But as I was learning how to read the Bible inside a bundle of serious-minded Christians, I knew no one who really practiced the Sabbath. I quickly learned that the Christian Sunday, which focuses on fellowship and worship, is not the same as the Jewish Sabbath, which focuses on rest from labor. (You can read about this in any good Bible dictionary or on Wikipedia.) The Sabbath was described in the Bible, and it wasn't a "that settles it for me!" for anyone I knew.
What really got me going was that nobody seemed interested in this question. Yes, I did hear that some thought a passage like Colossians 2:16 may-but only may-have given Gentiles permission not to keep Sabbath, but the issue was not crystal clear. I was learning that we sometimes, rightly or wrongly, live out the Bible by not doing something in the Bible!
Tithing
The Bible I read taught tithing, but the Bible does not insist that all of the tithe must go to a local church. Truth be told, the New Testament doesn't even bring up the tithe. In the Bible the tithe is a combination of spiritual support (for the temple) and social ser vice (for the poor). Moses says tithes are to be given not only to the Levites (roughly the temple servants) but also to the alien, to the fatherless, and to the widow (Deuteronomy 26:12). The churches I was attending had nothing to do with immigrants, did little to help orphans, and so far as I knew did little to strengthen widows.
What was more, the tithe we were hearing about was something we were to give to our local church for buildings, maintenance, pastoral salaries, missionaries, and the like. But the Bible said that I-as a tither-was to give some of my tithe to the Levite and also to those who were marginalized and suffering. This was something neither I nor anyone I knew was doing. I was learning that we sometimes live out the Bible, rightly or wrongly, by morphing one thing into another, that is, by taking a tithe for temple assistants and also for the poor and turning it into a tithe for the local church. It might be fine to read the Bible like this, but we should at least admit what we are doing: in a word, we are morphing.
Foot Washing
Another discovery I made was that Jesus explicitly commanded foot washing in John 13:14. Widows who received benefits from the church were known as those who had washed the feet of saints (1 Timothy 5:10). St. Augustine, three and a half centuries later, writes about Christians washing the feet of the freshly baptized, so I knew that the practice continued well beyond the New Testament days. But I was surrounded by Bible believers and had never seen this happen. I learned that some Christians still practice this, but no one I knew (except a high school friend's church) was doing it. We were either ignoring what the Bible taught or morphing it into a cultural parallel like hanging up one another's coats and offering our guests something to drink. A New Testament scholar, Bill Mounce, in his exhaustive study of 1 Timothy, draws this conclusion about what Paul says of widows: "Paul is not asking if the widow followed church ritual [physically washed feet]; he is asking if she was the type of person who had done good deeds throughout her life." In other words, Paul is not speaking of something literal-real washing of feet-but of an underlying principle-serving others. What I learned is that sometimes we look behind the text to grasp a timeless principle and the principle is more important than doing the actual words.
Bill Mounce might be right, but my question as a college student was this one: "How did we know Paul's words were really only describing a symptom of a person of good deeds instead of a literal requirement?" Some suggested to me to quit asking such pesky questions and just follow along, but inside I was learning to ask what for me has a been a lifelong joyous ride of exploring how we live out the Bible.
Charismatic Gifts
The more I became aware of the rise of the charismatic movement, the more I discovered Jesus, Paul, and Peter had the power to work miracles (Matthew 4:23; 10:8; Acts 4:1-12; 16:16-18). In my first year of Bible reading I learned that Christians in Paul's churches gave words of prophecy (1 Corinthians 12-14). And I knew Jesus said that his followers would do even greater things than he did. No one that I knew was doing miracles or giving words of prophecy. What I learned from this experience is an expression that sums up the way many read the Bible: "that was then, but this is now."
In other words, I learned that God spoke in various ways in various times. And I was taught that God wasn't saying those things today. I was only beginning to wonder just how enormous a dragon that little expression-"that was then, but this is now"-was hiding. I learned that sometimes the Bible expects things that were designed for that time but not for our time. I wasn't sure how we knew that, but I was sure we were making decisions like that. This really sealed my question: How do we know how to live out the Bible? But there are a few more examples for us to consider.
Surrendering Possessions
There is nothing clearer than this statement by Jesus about possessions: "In the same way, those of you who do not give up everything you have [possessions] cannot be my disciples" (Luke 14:33). Two chapters earlier Jesus said, "Sell your possessions and give to the poor" (12:33). If there is anything that is straightforward, those two verses are. I knew enough about church history to know that St. Francis did exactly what Jesus ordered, or at least he got very close. I also knew that we weren't following Jesus' words at all. In fact, I knew that most Christians were not living below their means and were in fact living well beyond their means.
(Continues...)
Excerpted from The Blue Parakeetby Scot McKnight Copyright © 2008 by Scot McKnight. Excerpted by permission.
All rights reserved. No part of this excerpt may be reproduced or reprinted without permission in writing from the publisher.
Excerpts are provided by Dial-A-Book Inc. solely for the personal use of visitors to this web site.
Product details
- Publisher : Zondervan; First Edition (October 23, 2008)
- Language : English
- Hardcover : 240 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0310284880
- ISBN-13 : 978-0310284888
- Item Weight : 13.6 ounces
- Dimensions : 5.75 x 0.88 x 8.25 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #1,188,681 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- #3,830 in Christian Social Issues (Books)
- #17,605 in Christian Bible Study (Books)
- #23,155 in Christian Spiritual Growth (Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author
Born in Southern Illinois, came of age in Freeport, Illinois, attended college in Grand Rapids, MI, seminary at Trinity in Deerfield, IL. Did a PhD at the University of Nottingham in England.
Now a professor of more than four decades.
Scot is awaiting the publication of a book this fall called A Church called Tov (Tyndale).
Two children, two grandchildren.
Kris, my wife, is a psychologist and the greatest woman on earth.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
McKnight introduces three primary ways in which we have read and continue to read the Bible. First, he identifies the "read and retrieve" method, through which we seek to import all biblical practices to the present (as at least as many as can be "salvaged"). The crucial problem with this method is that it ignores the context in which the practices took shape. For instance, if we retrieve the Pauline practice of having women be silent in church, we miss the context of Paul's church audiences in which most women had not had very many educational opportunities. The second way of reading scripture that McKnight introduces is "reading through tradition" - i.e., "fossilizing" certain decisions of earlier generations of the Church and then rigidly adhering to the practices of this tradition. Again there are some significant problems with this approach, and the primary one is the similar to that of the "read and retrieve" method, it forsakes the context of the present in favor of the context of some earlier era. The final approach that McKnight identifies and the one for which he advocates over the remainder of the book is "reading with tradition." This approach uses tradition as a guide by which to read the scriptures in the context of the present. Unlike the "reading through tradition" approach, this practice allows for (respectful) disagreements with the traditional readings.
McKnight spends most of the book exploring three facets of the "reading with tradition" approach to the Bible: story, listening and discerning. Story is McKnight's answer to the question of biblical ontology (i.e., "What is the Bible?"). He begins this section by naming shortcuts that we often take in reading the Bible: e.g., reading scripture as a collection of laws or a collection of blessings, or as a narcissistic reflection of who I am, etc. McKnight does a superb job of mapping out the high level course of the biblical story - from creation to the final consummation of God's reconciled creation. Reflecting his work in ACCA, he rightly emphasizes that the community of God's people (not just individuals) plays an important role in the biblical story.
Listening is the second facet of reading the Bible that he explores. Here he reminds us that listening is rooted in a love for the speaker. In this section, McKnight paints the imagery of our relationship to the Bible as one of conversation. This conversation is between us and the text, but also - as the "reading with tradition" approach implies - with tradition and most importantly with God. Thus, the end of scripture is not knowledge of the text itself, but rather knowledge of and a love for the Author. McKnight's chapter on missional listening (the "why" of reading scripture) - which in his wife's estimation was the book's "boring" chapter - is excellent. We listen to God in the scriptures, according to McKnight, in order to be transformed into the image of Christ and swept up into the biblical story.
The final facet of the "reading with tradition" approach that McKnight explores is discernment. If, as McKnight has established in his sections on story and listening, the end of scripture is knowing and loving God and being transformed into Christ's image, then discernment, the applying of scripture to decisions about the shape of how we will live our lives is essential. McKnight's emphasis here on the local church is well-stated, as the local church is the basic environment in which our faith is embodied. My primary disappointment with this book, and it was a small one and one similar to what I expressed about ACCA, is that it does not go far enough in its depiction of discernment. The types of discernments that McKnight posits as examples are primarily of a doctrinal or religious nature (divorce/re-marriage, circumcision, tongues, etc.) Such decisions are important in the life of the church, but focusing on them exclusively can obscure the importance of the biblical discernment of questions that pertain to life throughout the week and not just on Sundays (how we will earn livings, where we will live, what we will eat, how we will engage our neighbors, etc.) I suspect that McKnight would agree that these discernments are important to determining the shape of our shared life together in the local church community, but it would have been beneficial to see a little more exploration of this area.
The book's final section is a careful application of McKnight's method to the question of women in ministry. This example does a good job, not only of illustrating the "reading with tradition" approach, but also at illuminating pitfalls that lurk along the way.
The Blue Parakeet is one of the best books that I have encountered on how the Bible should be read. McKnight is dead-on in the method he prescribes and in the dangers he exposes in other methods and in the shortcuts that we are wont to take. He is an excellent writer, who humorously and engagingly addresses this challenging topic in language that will be accessible to most readers. There were a few points where I cringed at the individualism in the titles used for chapters and sections (especially "How do I benefit from the Bible?") but these may have originated with McKnight's editors. This is an excellent book that should be read and considered in our churches and I pray that we will take its message to heart!
This review originally appeared in
The Englewood Review of Books, Vol 1, #42.
Scot proposes the "how do we live it" question while tossing out a number of difficult passages from the Bible. These difficult passages are what he calls the "blue parakeets" (you'll have to read the book to find out the story behind that label; it's a pretty cool illustration). Without giving a definitive answer to how we live it, Scot suggests the answer to "how we live" can be found in "how we read" the Bible.
The opening chapters describe some of the various methods people employ for reading the Bible. Each of these methods produces unique outcomes which bring with them certain challenges when the reading moves to life application. I enjoyed the descriptions of the different styles (or ways) that people read the Bible and was able to personally relate to what was being described. I have approached reading the Bible in some of the ways that Scot illustrates, and I have experienced the general outcome (incongruous application) which results from reading the Bible in a way that was not intended. McKnight proposes that the Bible was meant to be read as a story and he walks the reader through his reasoning for this belief. Although I do not need convincing (I share the same belief), I think the points put forth by the author to build his case are very persuasive.
The book moves quickly from its foundational premise of "problem" (the generalized understanding that most of us in contemporary society approach the Bible incorrectly) to "nuts and bolts" solution (embracing the Bible as humanity's story). McKnight finishes his book with a response to the question of how the story approach relates to life-application in "real-life" with a case study illustration.
This is a high-level overview of The Blue Parakeet; however, before I complete my review, I'd like to share a few points from the book that really stood out for me. As a disclaimer, please note that these points are my subjective interpretations and "your mileage may vary..."
(1) The methodology and/or way that we approach reading the Bible. I reaenjoyed reading about and peering into the thinking of Scot when he shared his thoughts on how to read the Bible. His dialectic approach in presenting his case was fair, thorough, and thoughtfully presented. Throughout his exploration and presentation I was continually asking questions, making reasoned deductions, and examining my own habits when approaching the Bible. I was effectually "drawn in" to the conversation. I was not a casual observer. I think this is the aim of most writers.
(2) I connected my style and approach to the Bible in a similar fashion with that of the author's. While this may not be the case with every reader, I was affirmed and challenged at the same time. I am an adherent of the Methodist approach to Bible reading. This approach, attributed to John Wesley, is known as the Wesleyan-Quadrilateral and can be described as follows:
Scripture - the Holy Bible (Old and New Testaments)
Tradition - the two millennia history of the Christian Church
Reason - rational thinking and sensible interpretation
Experience - a Christian's personal and communal journey in Christ
(For a more thorough explanation of the Wesleyan-Quad, there are any number of references online) The gist of the process can be summarized as Scripture holding authority, but not ultimate authority. Tradition and history of the people of God weigh-in when interpreting scripture. Reason comes into play as we ask questions and wrestle with Scripture to make application of it in our lives. Finally, experience gives voice to interpretation as we live God's Word today.
I think this approach of reading and applying the Bible connects with the heart of The Blue Parakeet. This is, however, only my opinion. Personally, I advocate and employ an additional approach and view when interpreting and applying God's Word in my life. I prefer to use the Wesleyan-Quad as a base or foundation for my reading. I use inductive study and lectio divina as a dual path support of the WQ for a three-point methodology; it works for me and serves as a check and balance keeping my reading honest.
(3) Intimate and Personal God...Oneness and Unity with God. From "Wiki-stories" to the One Story, McKnight engrosses the reader (at least this reader) in the unity-story of God-man-eternity-relationship-community. Knowing this Story and living it are two entirely different ends of the spectrum. Scot reminds us that it is paramount for our focus to remain fixated on the Story of God-the Story of Man and our relationship and role in the His-Story.
(4) A Teacher. Showing his gift and calling as a teacher, Scot devotes a large segment of the book to a case study of reading the Bible as story and wrestling with application of the precepts and teachings of God's word in a changing world. This "lab practical" is an excellent exercise and the case study alone is worth the time and energy of reading this work. (I won't ruin the story by sharing what the nature and text of the study is)
There are a number of other delightful discussions awaiting the readers of The Blue Parakeet. I have thoroughly enjoyed my time spent with it and continue to carry it in my book bag, finding myself flipping through pages and re-reading passages here and there. It has prompted thought, affirmed some methods, and challenged me in areas as well. I recommend the book with both thumbs up.
It is easy to put yourself neatly in the box of those around you - evangelical, baptist, protestant, catholic, liberal, conservative - whatever it is. But when it comes down to it, the Bible was not written with our 21st century categories of thought in mind. McKnight does a great job at looking at culture and context when he highlights some examples of passages that some denominations or schools of thought either brush off, ignore, or twist.
But he doesn't say - "Here's a bible, go in a room by yourself and read it, and forget all of the church theology you've ever heard. He makes the argument that a person should read the bible WITH tradition so that you have a basis of commonly accepted theology and practice, but you still have the freedom to break away, or reform.
I highly recommend this book for the serious student of the bible, and one who has a decent foundation in reading scripture on their own.
Top reviews from other countries
Overall, a great read and highly recommended - some more conservative folk will struggle with the second half but read it anyway.